Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the iPhone 8 Plus's 87.1 overall score. Samsung Galaxy F62's body is notably newer than iPhone 8 Plus's, although it's just a little bit heavier and thicker. The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and more cpu cores (although they are slower).
The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with more brightness and a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy F62 counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a much better battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.