Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62, having an 88.1 score against 88.1. IPhone X's body is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy F62, although it was released many years before. The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy F62, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with 2 more processing cores (although they are slower) and a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone X has a little more vivid display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436, more display brightness and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much larger sensor.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a greater storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.