Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR's general score of 82. Although Galaxy F62 is newer than the Apple iPhone XR, it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. IPhone XR features a more powerful processor than Galaxy F62, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and 2 more CPU cores (although they are slower).
The Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better looking display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has much lower brightness, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 138 percent greater battery size. Galaxy F62 has a better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.