Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Apple iPhone XS, with an 88.1 score against 84.2. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is incredibly newer than Apple iPhone XS's, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Apple iPhone XS has a little sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, more brightness and a little greater display pixel density.
The iPhone XS has a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 2 more cores and a 64-bit processor. Galaxy F62 has much more storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh. Galaxy F62 features a superior camera than iPhone XS, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.