Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is better than Asus ROG Phone's 77.1 global score. The Galaxy F62 design is noticeably newer than the Asus ROG Phone's, but it's just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Asus ROG Phone features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Asus ROG Phone counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a brighter screen and a bit higher screen pixel density. Asus ROG Phone features a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy F62, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery duration than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a greater camera than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.