Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black glare |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Asus ROG Phone 3's 86.3 score. Galaxy F62's construction is a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Asus ROG Phone 3, although both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Asus ROG Phone 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 6 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Asus ROG Phone 3 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more brightness. The Asus ROG Phone 3 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same camera aperture, a same resolution camera and a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy F62 has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Asus ROG Phone 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 has greater battery duration than Asus ROG Phone 3, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.