Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black glare |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition's score of 87.4. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version and Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features. Although Galaxy F62 and Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition were released with only a couple months difference, Galaxy F62 is a little thinner and just a bit lighter.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a lot brighter screen. The Galaxy F62 features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 4 more cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy F62 has longer battery lifetime than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 6000mAh. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, a same resolution camera and the same sensor size, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.