Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and Silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), with a general score of 88.1 against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy F62's design is newer than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019)'s, but it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give all the same OS features.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a higher number of cores. Galaxy F62 has a little bit better looking display than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy F62 features a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery performance than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.