Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Blue and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6's 81.1 global score. Galaxy F62's construction is notably newer and a bit thinner than the Google Nexus 6's, although it is also heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1, giving you lots of additional features and better performance.
The Google Nexus 6 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 4 CPU cores, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Google Nexus 6 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 captures much better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger aperture to take better photos in low-light situations and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.