Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Google Pixel 3's 80 global score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3, although it is way heavier and thicker. Galaxy F62 has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 3 has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy F62 features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.