Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's score of 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is noticeably newer, but heavier and thicker than the Google Pixel 3 XL. Google Pixel 3 XL has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because although it has 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with more cores. Galaxy F62 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 104 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.