Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is better than Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. Galaxy F62's design is newer than the Google Pixel 3a's, although it is way heavier and thicker. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should offer the same OS features. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display. The Galaxy F62 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy F62 takes way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.