Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's global score of 78.9. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should offer all the same operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it's way heavier and thicker.
Galaxy F62 has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has less CPU cores , it also counts with more RAM. The Galaxy F62 features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a lot more mega pixels camera and a much larger sensor. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.