Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a bit better than Google Pixel 4, with a overall score of 88.1 against 81.9. Galaxy F62 is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 4, but it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy F62 and the Google Pixel 4 feature quite similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of display.
Google Pixel 4 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Galaxy F62 features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy F62 features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy F62 has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 150 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.