Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 global score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer device than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it is thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 4 more cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a better pixels count per inch in the screen. Galaxy F62 has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy F62 features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. Galaxy F62 features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.