Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, with a global score of 88.1 against 82.9. Even being the best phone in this review, Galaxy F62's body is noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Pixel 4a. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS. Google Pixel 4a and Galaxy F62 both feature really similar CPUs, and although the Google Pixel 4a has more cpu cores , they both have 6 GB of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger screen. The Galaxy F62 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh. The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.