Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G's overall score of 87.5. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system. Despite being the best phone we compare here, Galaxy F62 is a notably heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Google Pixel 4a 5G.
Galaxy F62 features a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 4 more cpu cores (but slower).
Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot better resolution back camera and a much bigger camera sensor.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.