Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62, with an 89 score against 88.1. Google Pixel 5 is a incredibly lighter and thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy F62, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit lower pixel count per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger screen. The Galaxy F62 features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.