Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is just a bit better than the Galaxy F62, having a 92.1 score against 88.1. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design construction is notably newer and a bit thinner, but a little heavier than Galaxy F62. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version while Galaxy F62 has Android 11, so it provides a couple additional features and a performance increase.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 18 GB more RAM memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has much more brightness, a little bigger screen, a just a bit better screen pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1280 x 2800.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower video quality and a much lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way larger aperture. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F62, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy F62 counts with better battery duration than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 5600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.