Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 8.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. Galaxy F62's design is way newer and a little bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than the HTC One M9. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, giving you a lot of extra features.
The HTC One M9 has a bit better processor than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor, more processing cores and a 64-bit processing unit. The HTC One M9 features a better looking display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little better pixel amount per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy F62 has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera, a much larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a bigger camera aperture.
The Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.