Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than the HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a noticeably newer cellphone than HTC U Ultra, although it is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel density.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 processing cores, the Galaxy F62 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy F62 features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy F62 shoots greater pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also has a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 133% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.