Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than the HTC U11, with a global score of 88.1 against 77.6. The Galaxy F62 design is much newer than the HTC U11's, although it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. The HTC U11 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores.
HTC U11 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.