Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-02-22 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than LG G5, with an 88.1 score against 76.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy F62 construction is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and extremely thicker than the LG G5.
LG G5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a little better processing power than LG G5, and although they both have 4 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G5, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 captures better videos and photos than LG G5, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery life than LG G5, because it has a 150% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.