Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's score of 77. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy F62 body is a lot newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than the LG G7 Fit.
LG G7 Fit counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way brighter display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher pixel density. The Galaxy F62 counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy F62 also has more RAM. Galaxy F62 captures greater photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 133 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.