Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 score. Although the Galaxy F62 is newer than the LG G7 ThinQ, it is somewhat thicker and way heavier. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a brighter display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with way more brightness, a better pixels amount per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much clearer photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way larger sensor and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy F62 features a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.