Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the LG G8 ThinQ, having a overall score of 88.1 against 84.3. Even though the Galaxy F62 is newer than the LG G8 ThinQ, it is a lot heavier and thicker. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has 11 version while LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a brighter display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a better screen density and more brightness.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a greater number of cores. The LG G8 ThinQ has a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy F62, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 captures much better videos and photos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.