Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than LG G8S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy F62's construction is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG G8S ThinQ.
Galaxy F62 features a little more vivid display than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The LG G8S ThinQ has a bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8S ThinQ has a little faster processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the LG G8S ThinQ also has 4 more processing cores. The Galaxy F62 features a lot better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery life than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 97% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.