Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 overall score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10, so it provides some extra features and optimized performance. The Galaxy F62 design is newer than the LG G8X ThinQ's, although it's thicker and heavier.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
LG G8X ThinQ features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 75 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.