Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is much better than LG V10, having a global score of 88.1 against 78.6. Even though Galaxy F62 is way newer than LG V10, it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, offering some nice extra features.
The LG V10 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with slightly more memory to store more games and applications than LG V10, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a faster CPU than LG V10, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy F62 has a superior camera than LG V10, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.