Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting a global score of 88.1 against 82.5. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Galaxy F62 is noticeably newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it's a lot heavier and extremely thicker.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little faster processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 4 more cores. The LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel number per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy F62, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.