Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. Although Samsung Galaxy F62 is way newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it is way thicker and incredibly heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.