Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 global score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, so it gives some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is notably newer than LG V40 ThinQ's, but it's noticeably heavier and thicker.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a little sharper display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy F62 has a slightly better memory for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 4 more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photos in low light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.