Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's score of 87.6. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should give very similar operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer and a bit lighter phone than the LG V60 ThinQ, although it's a little thicker.
Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a just a little worse display pixel density, a bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution. LG V60 ThinQ features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery life than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 40% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 captures better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have the same video frame rates, the same resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 0.59 inches back camera sensor and a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.