Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the LG Velvet's 87.1 overall score. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer phone than LG Velvet, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better looking display than LG Velvet, although it has a bit smaller display, a just a little worse number of pixels per inch in the display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The LG Velvet has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the LG Velvet also has a larger number of cores (but slower). The LG Velvet has a greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy F62 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.