Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's 88.1 score. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but LG Wing has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version. The LG Wing is a somewhat thicker and heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy F62.
LG Wing counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper display than LG Wing, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit worse display pixels density and a little smaller display.
The LG Wing has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F62, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory. LG Wing shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size sensor, a same resolution back camera, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also has better video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery performance than LG Wing, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.