Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Microsoft |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, with an 88.1 score against 85.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F62 and the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 were released only 7 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy F62 body is notably thicker but also notably lighter than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2. These phones use the same Android 11 OS.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher 1892 x 2688 resolution, a really brighter screen, a little bit better pixel density and a larger display.
The Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4449mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.