Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is slightly better than Galaxy F62, having a general score of 89.6 against 88.1. Motorola edge is a somewhat lighter phone than Galaxy F62, but both have the same thickness. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola edge has older 10 version and Galaxy F62 has Android 11.
The Galaxy F62 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola edge, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy F62 also has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of display. Motorola edge features a bit better performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola edge also has a larger number of cores (but slower).
The Motorola edge features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy F62, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola edge, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola edge counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy F62. They have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates, the same sensor size, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.