Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 20, with a global score of 88.1 against 86.1. The Galaxy F62 construction is notably thicker and a lot heavier than Motorola Edge 20. Both devices we compare here have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Motorola Edge 20 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has more CPU cores (but slower) and a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20. They have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the same pixel density and a screen of the same size.
Motorola Edge 20 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a 75 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.