Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy F62's 88.1 general score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has newer 12 version while Galaxy F62 has Android 11, so it gives you lots of additional features. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy F62, even when they were released only 6 months apart.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro. They have a same size screen, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and the same number of pixels in each screen inch.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.