Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Mineral Gray |
| -- | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge (2022), getting an 88.1 score against 84.7. These devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is older, thicker and notably heavier than the Motorola Edge (2022).
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a little better performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a larger number of cores (but slower). Samsung Galaxy F62 has a slightly better display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a just a bit worse display density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a bit larger screen.
Galaxy F62 captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP. Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better battery performance than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.