Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having an 88.1 score against 83.4. Although it's the best device we compare here, Samsung Galaxy F62 is a noticeably older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker device than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size display, the same 1080 x 2400px resolution and a greater pixels count in each inch in the display, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has way more brightness. The Galaxy F62 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 less cpu cores.
The Galaxy F62 has more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4600mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.