Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 86.3. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is much older, somewhat heavier and thicker than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 lesser processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the same count of pixels in each inch in the display and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way brighter display.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality and a much tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F62, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.