Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Despite being the best we are comparing here, Galaxy F62 is a notably older, a little thicker and a bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a sharper display than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a greater pixels amount in each display inch, a display of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has much more screen brightness. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better camera than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and video in low-light situations and a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F62, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.