Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 82.6. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy F62's construction is a little bit thicker and just a little heavier than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus. The Galaxy F62 has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit lower pixels density, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Galaxy F62 and the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus count with similar processing units, because although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (but slower). The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with more storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy F62 features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.