Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 global score. Although Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit heavier than the Moto G Power, it's a bit thinner and newer. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 counts with a better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery life than Moto G Power, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.