Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), having a overall score of 88.1 against 79.3. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy F62's construction is just a little thicker and just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a quite greater pixels density. Galaxy F62 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a much better battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.