Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's 86.2 score. Even though the Galaxy F62 is a better cellphone than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, we must highlight that it's also a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
Moto G200 5G features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more processing cores. The Galaxy F62 has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bit smaller screen and a bit worse count of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy F62 features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photos. The Galaxy F62 features much more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better battery duration than Moto G200 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.