Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cosmic blue and Crystal pink |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 14.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the Moto G8 Plus, with a general score of 88.1 against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the Moto G8 Plus. The Galaxy F62 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because although it has less cores (but faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy F62 features just a bit better looking display than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy F62 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G8 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy F62 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has a 75% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.