Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than the Moto G8 Power, getting an 88.1 score against 76. Galaxy F62's design is newer and just a little thinner than Moto G8 Power's, although it's also just a bit heavier. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little better performance than Moto G8 Power, because although it has less processing cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G8 Power, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.