Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Moto G9 Plus, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 80.5. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features and improved performance. Even when Galaxy F62 and Moto G9 Plus were only released 6 months apart, Galaxy F62 is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Galaxy F62 has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy F62 has a slightly better screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a little bit greater pixel density.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus and Galaxy F62 both have quite similar cameras, both of them have a same resolution camera in the back, the same (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size sensor and a F1.8 aperture. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.